From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 24 08:28:49 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA00821 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 08:28:49 -0800 Received: from NS.netvision.net.il (root@ns.NetVision.net.il [192.114.201.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA00815 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 08:28:42 -0800 Received: from ugen.NetManage.co.il (ugen.netmanage.co.il [192.114.78.165]) by NS.netvision.net.il (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA13482 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 18:28:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 18:27:50 IST From: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" Subject: Trap before syscall... To: freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com X-Mailer: Chameleon 4.00-Arm-25, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Well..i am working on PT_SYSCALL option,for fun mostly but may be later it can go into FB..anyway what's by guru's oppinion the right place to set flags or something to tell syscall that process need to be trapped on this syscall..currently i am trying to use p_flags but i really not sure this is the place...is there any place that more convinient? Actually i need even two flags... Advice will be appreciated... -- -=Ugen J.S.Antsilevich=- NetVision - Israeli Commercial Internet | Learning E-mail: ugen@NetVision.net.il | To Fly. [c] Phone : +972-4-550330 |