From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 13:56:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947E47CD; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E448FC0A; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id jf20so1540978bkc.13 for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:56:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/D1siGz/mQ2jLQQjFVeSJv+bcCEq5rqGDGtmn7JK9vI=; b=mAmnkDWwDKrN8eJH55EAAhzE0/IF/ls/SJRO4ehqqVF18MiGqksnlwzEmcZLrN/xtp sNm53QhIamY+E2LqoVLFsRowoNqVGiwndrfcrmEbqL0xcfVKYgY1M8geaPQRq/K+N63q V4keNnJz3iRtU1ZnqeqZ0M6N/9ECOVz8L7oMhL7tstj2FNFVOGf/DtlM6xMAnSwYfpGr vnClU/r6jx2408rtyKYxsOV5ekmu9ds6gDD89w89n1mqOYb0nNp/lcne0BUNhkuwIKID 0P3RwBnZySJEGf7fIxUCpvkBPiGAVN/EuMWUVPP/nUs2eJhU1wHSjOMUggqjiLHQObo0 +lbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.7.213 with SMTP id e21mr408577bke.32.1351864617773; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:56:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:56:57 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mountlate being too mount-happy From: Chris Rees To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Mateusz Guzik X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:56:59 -0000 On 2 Nov 2012 13:31, "Eitan Adler" wrote: > > On 2 November 2012 06:34, Chris Rees wrote: > > [Those who commented and helped in IRC are in CC] > > > > Hi all, > > > > As described in conf/137692 rc.d/mountlate runs mount -a -d -l to find > > late filesystems, and mounts them. > > > > Unfortunately, this also tries again to mount filesystems that are > > awaiting mount from the first time; for example a background nfs mount > > will not be mounted at this time, so mountlate tries to mount it > > again. > > > > The solution is for mountlate to check ONLY for filesystems that > > should be mounted late. > > perhaps we can teach mount a new option to only mount late filesystems (-L) ? I had been idly contemplating that too- it's a good idea. I'll take a look. Chris