From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 03:23:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B269E16A4CE; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:23:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv01.sparkit.no (srv01.sparkit.no [193.69.116.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C1E43D2D; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:23:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws ([193.69.114.88]) by srv01.sparkit.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CBNkBs037405; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:23:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eivind@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ws (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws (8.12.9/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CBNXr1005192; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:23:33 GMT (envelope-from eivind@ws) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by ws (8.12.9/8.12.10/Submit) id i2CBNX78005184; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:23:33 GMT (envelope-from eivind) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:22:32 +0000 From: Eivind Eklund To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040312112232.GB5000@FreeBSD.org> References: <200403120709.i2C79i2h019623@lonesome.lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403120709.i2C79i2h019623@lonesome.lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: ports-developers@FreeBSD.org cc: docs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] document procedure to add a new ports category to Committer's Guide X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:23:51 -0000 The text generally looked good to me; I only have one question: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:09:44AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > + > + Submit a PR to add the new category to > + the Porter's Handbook, and to add it to > + www/en/ports/categories, > + and assign it to docs. > + > + > + > + Submit a PR to request that the web > + page build be updated to reflect the new > + category. The responsibility for doing this > + is not yet well established. > + Can't we just have people fix this directly for the usual case, and have a "submit a doc PR if you feel uncomfortable about doing that" as an option? Eivind.