From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 11:21:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42C537B405 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail12.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A10643FCB for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:21:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 1573 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 18:21:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Apr 2003 18:21:54 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3AILiOv053187; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:21:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:21:45 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Nate Lawson cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:21:50 -0000 On 10-Apr-2003 Nate Lawson wrote: > Please take this to arch@. Headers changed appropriately. > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> On 09-Apr-2003 Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > Whatever, path components should be path components. >> >> You mean like this? >> >> > sysctl -N net.inet.tcp.syncache >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.count >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit > > The answer to your question will depend on whether or not he likes the > sysctl namespace. My question was different: since jail already implies > a location in file namespace, why implement a new and disjoint namespace > for it? jail -n one /foo/bar jail -n two /foo/bar The path for a jail is not necessairly unique across all jails. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/