Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Jan 2022 01:42:32 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 260897] Replace security/py-pycrypto with security/py-pycryptodome
Message-ID:  <bug-260897-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260897

            Bug ID: 260897
           Summary: Replace security/py-pycrypto with
                    security/py-pycryptodome
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: yuri@freebsd.org
                CC: john@saltant.com, koobs@FreeBSD.org
                CC: john@saltant.com, koobs@FreeBSD.org

Created attachment 230647
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D230647&action=
=3Dedit
replace-pycrypto-with-pycryptodome.patch

Hello folks,

Currently some ports use security/py-pycrypto and some other ports use
security/py-pycryptodome which causes conflicts.

The PyCryptodome README (https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome) says th=
at
PyCryptodome is a drop-in replacement of outdated and insecure
security/py-pycrypto.

It's probably a good idea to replace security/py-pycrypto in all depending
ports to both reduce security risks and solve conflicts.

The attached patch replaces security/py-pycrypto with security/py-pycryptod=
ome.


Yuri

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-260897-7788>