From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep  7 07:45:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA20952
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 07:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usr09.primenet.com (tlambert@usr09.primenet.com [206.165.6.209])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA20941;
          Sun, 7 Sep 1997 07:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA08900;
	Sun, 7 Sep 1997 07:45:30 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <199709071445.HAA08900@usr09.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: lousy disk perf. under cpu load (was IDE vs SCSI)
To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 14:45:30 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, sos@sos.freebsd.dk, mal@algonet.se,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199709070512.AAA00465@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Sep 7, 97 00:12:32 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > 
> > Why is it necessary to bring this up over and over again.
> >
> Because I think that people sometimes think that the world changes
> from time to time.  SCSI is really great in large high-end systems
> for sure.  EIDE isn't the joke that IDE was 4-5yrs ago though.

Damn.  I can't pass up that straight-line...

"OK, then what kind of joke *is* EIDE?"

					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.