Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:40:16 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Indiscriminately installing all .h files in /usr/include/* Message-ID: <20030210224016.GH88781@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <143501c2d154$9c3c70e0$52557f42@errno.com> References: <43624.1044915959@critter.freebsd.dk> <143501c2d154$9c3c70e0$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> [030210 14:34] wrote: > > > > I would prefer labeling the stuff that should go into /usr/include, > > it shouldn't be the default to export stuff unless you ask for it. > > Sticking this stuff inside include files means modifying imported files. > I'd actually prefer a mechanism like this to lurk in the Makefiles as you > can fully encapsulate requirements like the /usr/include/<dir> is different > than the source directory. That makes sense. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030210224016.GH88781>