Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:30:54 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> Subject: Re: Updated geom_vinum Message-ID: <51553.1075026654@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:57:09 %2B1030." <20040125102709.GA50402@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040125102709.GA50402@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >>> It only does a subset of the Vinum stats. >> >> What is missing ? > >As I said: > >> It only does a subset of the Vinum stats. It's also unclear how it >> can handle important Vinum-specific things like the number of >> fragmented requests. > >There are other things too, but in view of this issue, I don't think >it's worth discussing the relative merits of the other stats. It >would be more interesting to consider a distributed manner of keeping >stats. I wasn't asking to start a pissing contest, I was asking to find out if there is anything which should be added to the GEOM stats. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51553.1075026654>