From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 25 02:30:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6B80516A4CE; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 02:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E74B943D41; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 02:30:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0PAUsuO051554;
	Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:30:54 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:57:09 +1030."
             <20040125102709.GA50402@wantadilla.lemis.com> 
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:30:54 +0100
Message-ID: <51553.1075026654@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
Subject: Re: Updated geom_vinum 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:30:58 -0000

In message <20040125102709.GA50402@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
 writes:

>>> It only does a subset of the Vinum stats.
>>
>> What is missing ?
>
>As I said:
>
>> It only does a subset of the Vinum stats.  It's also unclear how it
>> can handle important Vinum-specific things like the number of
>> fragmented requests.
>
>There are other things too, but in view of this issue, I don't think
>it's worth discussing the relative merits of the other stats.  It
>would be more interesting to consider a distributed manner of keeping
>stats.

I wasn't asking to start a pissing contest, I was asking to find out
if there is anything which should be added to the GEOM stats.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.