From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Sun May 10 20:32:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBFD2F2DEA for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 20:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@woodcruft.co.uk) Received: from lime.woodcruft.co.uk (woodcruft.co.uk [81.187.27.248]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Kwj72YG4z4cv0 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 20:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@woodcruft.co.uk) Received: by lime.woodcruft.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E9A401254C3; Sun, 10 May 2020 21:32:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 21:32:03 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: FreeBSD Docs Subject: manpages query (net/openntpd) Message-ID: <20200510203203.GA82843@lime.woodcruft.co.uk> Reply-To: Frank Shute Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Docs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Ring-Status: 'Complete' X-Organisation: 'Woodcruft Ltd.' X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Kwj72YG4z4cv0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of frank@woodcruft.co.uk designates 81.187.27.248 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=frank@woodcruft.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.03 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[frank@woodcruft.co.uk]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[woodcruft.co.uk]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20712, ipnet:81.187.0.0/16, country:GB]; IP_SCORE(-1.73)[ipnet: 81.187.0.0/16(-4.80), asn: 20712(-3.76), country: GB(-0.07)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 20:32:12 -0000 Hi, I installed net/openntpd some time ago. I think I read about it's usage possibly on OpenBSD's site. Installed it & did the necessary in rc.conf The other day I wanted to have a look at the local docs for it as I felt the need to twiddle with its start up args. As always, I have a look to see what docs it comes with: $ pkg info -l openntpd openntpd-6.2p3_2,2: /usr/local/etc/ntpd.conf.sample /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/480.status-openntpd /usr/local/etc/rc.d/openntpd /usr/local/man/man5/ntpd.conf.5.gz /usr/local/man/man8/ntpctl.8.gz /usr/local/man/man8/ntpd.8.gz /usr/local/sbin/ntpctl /usr/local/sbin/ntpd /usr/local/share/licenses/openntpd-6.2p3_2,2/ISCL /usr/local/share/licenses/openntpd-6.2p3_2,2/LICENSE /usr/local/share/licenses/openntpd-6.2p3_2,2/catalog.mk Ok. $ man ntpd Problems. As in front of it in $MANPATH is: /usr/share/man/man8/ntpd.8.gz and all the other manpages for ntpd from base. I happened to realise what was happening, so I could have a look at man(1) and: $ man -M /usr/local/man: ntpd so as to display the port manpage rather than the one installed by base. This seems to be a POLA violation and I was wondering how, if at all, it should be handled. A pkg message or rename the binaries or something else? Regards, -- Frank --* The Machine stops. *-- \verb# infinity # ----------------> $ \infty $