Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:27:04 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C++ in the kernel Message-ID: <2979.1193779624@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:48:26 %2B0100." <9bbcef730710300648s4a4162a9x25e5a092111eaab9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9bbcef730710300648s4a4162a9x25e5a092111eaab9@mail.gmail.com>, "Ivan Voras" writes: >I think the more advanced examples here: http://wiki.freebsd.org/K are >sufficiently diverged from C to make them ugly :) That page represents a SoC project which was didn't much suit my taste for language development, but which nontheless was kind of inspiring. >I think the context of my quote was in favour of this, as long as the >language remains standard. But then again, what exactly is "standard" in this context ? C99 ? or style(9) ? We already use a C-diallect, all I'm proposing is giving it more theeth so it can help us. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2979.1193779624>