From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Oct 13 5:47:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D8637B502 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id OAA28477; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:47:37 +0200 (MEST) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13k4Eo-0004Eo-00; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:47:02 +0200 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:47:02 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine update Message-ID: <20001013144702.A15082@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mail-Followup-To: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20001013130601.A14178@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:02:56PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:02:56PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > However, since then the 20000909 snapshot has hit the Net. (There was also > > a 20001002 snapshot at one time and I still have it, but it has since > > disappeared without a trace from the ftp servers and has not worked anyway.) > > I had prepared updates for the 20000909 and 20001002 ports, but these > caused significant problems on -STABLE in that, essentially, Wine stopped > working. Oh. I am sad to hear that. (20001002 did not work for me either, it could not load its kernel after starting up. But as I mentioned it has since disappeared, maybe because it was a too problematic snapshot, and no new snaps have since been produced...) > It caused me quite some headaches, but with the help of Ulrich Weigand we > traced this down to a bug in the GCC port that is used on 4.1-RELEASE and > I am currently testing a workaround by Ulrich. Hmmm. It is good that the problem got resolved, but I take both 4.1 and -CURRENT use the same gcc version... (2.95.2) Or am I missing something? (Obviously I am because there might have been a lot of subtle changes since i was no longer tracking -STABLE...) > > So, is there any reason why we do not update the wine port so that > > others might enjoy this thinggy, too? :-) [Maintainer of the port cc'd] > > Thanks for the Cc. If all goes right, I will have an update for the port > ready within 24 hours... Great! Thanks for the quick reaction! > > Also, although I do not have a -STABLE machine here, but if testing on > > -CURRENT is needed, please just tell me, and I'll be in a minute!:-) > > ...and will send this to you, so that you can double check it. > > Okay? Yes, certainly! Schoene Gruesse nach Wien! > Gerald -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message