From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Feb  5 12:43:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA10306
          for isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 12:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.intercenter.net ([207.211.128.20])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10286
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 12:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 24487 invoked from network); 5 Feb 1997 20:43:04 -0000
Received: from bigboy.intercenter.net (207.211.128.17)
  by mir.intercenter.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 1997 20:43:04 -0000
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:43:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net>
To: Intuitive Design Info <info@in-design.com>
cc: isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: senmail vs. qmail
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205090118.3521A-100000@nero.in-design.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970205153846.8266A-100000@bigboy.intercenter.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Intuitive Design Info wrote:

> Sendmail holes are endless.
> is there anyway to have qmail to do virtual emails?
> if yes, how have others found it's stability, etc?

I've been running qmail on FreeBSD and BSDI for many months now and have
had zero stability problems.

I'm using the qmsmac package for virtual domain email and once you get use
to the differences (and they are significant) qmail is a piece of cake to
maintain.

Ron