From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 11 22:27:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA29352 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 22:27:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA29347 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 22:27:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA24041; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 01:28:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id BAA18466; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 01:28:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 01:28:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. In-Reply-To: <12637.876627122@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > So what do folks think, can I kill it? [he said already knowing that > at least one dissenting vote will come from bde, great champion of > chatty kernels that he is. ;-)] I'd say the "strong, silent type" makes a much better kernel. :) :) -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk