From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 17 04:45:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA20540 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 04:45:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (wandering-wizard.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA20535 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 04:45:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA00282; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:54:54 +0100 (CET) To: Gregory Bond cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why no "date -a"? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:21:35 +1100." <199812170521.QAA13657@melba.bby.com.au> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:54:54 +0100 Message-ID: <280.913895694@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199812170521.QAA13657@melba.bby.com.au>, Gregory Bond writes: >This came up on the newsgroup today and I couldn't think of an answer. > >FreeBSD has adjtime(2) and Poul-Henning et al as nanosecond wranglers, yet no >"date -a". This must be a deliberate omission. Why? I havn't needed it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message