From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 15 8:12:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B5237B401 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (external.osdn.org.ua [212.40.34.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961D443F7C for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:12:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0FGCMGY081459; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:12:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0FGCLjh081458; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:12:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:12:20 +0200 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: "Sergey A. Osokin" Cc: Kris Kennaway , Edwin Groothuis , Joe Marcus Clarke , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports-bugs list created Message-ID: <20030115161220.GB81138@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20030113023912.GC14933@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1042426140.2162.76.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030113095428.GF50581@k7.mavetju> <20030113210051.GA35193@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030115160830.GA81138@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20030115161007.GA5731@freebsd.org.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030115161007.GA5731@freebsd.org.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Sergey A. Osokin! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:10:07PM +0300, you wrote: > > > > What I think is that from now on the PRs for ports are being mailed > > > > to ports-bugs@ instead of ports@. So all the change-requests, > > > > maintainer updates et al. It will get quiet here... :-) > > > > > > That is correct..the new list is just another majordomo list, and > > > bugmaster is going to transfer the destination for category="ports" PR > > > emails to the new list. > > > > Shouldn't it be good thing to subscribe all, who subscribed to ports@ to > > ports-bugs@ too to not violate user's/porter's expectations? > > I think its not right way. Why? We were getting PRs all the time in ports@, why should this cause any problems to current and future ports@ subscribers. Those, who is waiting for PR-clean ports@ list can unsubscribe from ports-bugs@. -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message