From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  2 07:41:07 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3DA16A41F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Jun 2007 07:41:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D26813C447
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Jun 2007 07:41:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.2])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1HuOGc-0004yR-Bz; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:43:18 +0400
Message-ID: <46611F10.5020008@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:41:04 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
References: <465C550D.1080501@icyb.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <465C550D.1080501@icyb.net.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade -o
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:41:07 -0000

Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I have a strange problem with portupgrade -o using
> portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5. I didn't have such problem with non-devel
> portupgrade and in fact that's how I switched to the -devel version.
> 
> The problem can be illustrated like follows:
> $ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
> ... nothing happens ...
> $ portupgrade -f -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2
> ... portaudio-18.1_2 from audio/portaudio is re-installed ...
> 
> Does anybody else see this ?
> 
> It's possible that I screwed something in my local setup because I made
> a few configuration changes recently. BTW, I have a patch from Stephen
> Montgomery-Smith applied: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112630

It's possible if installed version is greater than a version in origin.
You can compare two version with the command:
pkg_version -t version1 version2

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.