From owner-freebsd-hardware  Wed Jun 11 13:43:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA16790
          for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 13:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Sisyphos.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (Sisyphos.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.212.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA16784
          for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 13:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x14.mi.uni-koeln.de (annexr2-44.slip.Uni-Koeln.DE) by Sisyphos.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE with SMTP id AA03726
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <hardware@freebsd.org>); Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:43:41 +0200
Received: (from se@localhost) by x14.mi.uni-koeln.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id WAA07008; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Face: "<d]#=8pzx);RzeqSKI86OVa7=!0/(uRa.+B.9Z9\eNUn@UG?!`y7yt2dFNn%k4'.}](uE%
 yCO)$e&Y1%3EO~ifu6Q-#YUM&JZ't,}JkPnAz,8Dj33u%@GBi%[Y#LHz$]h7a<p4)-jKI7~sKjlP-^
 EvA[G;]v&0]W!EL%shs,{7x0|oqN4YVIs5,NI#,V{9"WF):5&RkOhyj*#-IAG}Tnu;YCF,d
Message-Id: <19970611224336.27939@mi.uni-koeln.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:43:36 +0200
From: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: poor memory bandwidth on ABIT IT5H rev 1.5
References: <19970610112536.48352@mi.uni-koeln.de> <Pine.BSF.3.91.970610101234.23498C-100000@www2.shoppersnet.com> <19970610213913.46089@mi.uni-koeln.de> <19970611093951.33576@keltia.freenix.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.74
In-Reply-To: <19970611093951.33576@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Wed, Jun 11, 1997 at 09:39:51AM +0200
Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Jun 11, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> wrote:
> According to Stefan Esser:
> > No, I don't think I wrote that (at least I didn't want to ... :)
> > The TX should be better than the VX, which was slow with EDO, but
> > slightly faster than the Triton 2 with SDRAM.
> 
> If what you call Triton 2 is HX, then HX doesn't support SDRAM. That is the
> main problem with HX (and AFAIK the only one).

Well, seems I (again) wrote a too complex sentence ...

I meant to say, the VX is slow with EDO, but with SDRAM
it may be slightly faster than the Triton 2 (HX), which
only supports EDO ... :)

Regards, STefan