From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 11 08:03:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0046416A4D2
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl (wn1.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F5E43D2A
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:03:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from adridg@sci.kun.nl)
Received: from wn4.sci.kun.nl by wn1.sci.kun.nl
	<freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>	id hBBG3k5w015982 (8.12.10/3.58);
	Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:03:46 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:03:46 +0100 (MET)
From: Adriaan de Groot <adridg@sci.kun.nl>
To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0312111647280.2661-100000@odin.cs.kun.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0312111702230.21968-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: (NM) Re: Linux emulation status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adridg@cs.kun.nl
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:03:49 -0000

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> Just to get this straight: does that mean that "we" (that's you, David,
> along with Peter) have chosen to do linux i386 32-bit ABI emulation first
> and to wait-and-see for the amd64 (x86_64 in linuxland) ABI emulation? Is
> there any hope of it being there "soon"?

Feh, just read David's other message on this subject. Damn cc's. With
i386-freebsd ABI compatibility, we'll finally have a working cvsup again,
won't we (barring someone porting ezm3) ?