From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jun 25 6:39:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hostigos.otherwhen.com (dialin2017.pernet.net [205.229.2.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8237614D1B for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mavery@mail.otherwhen.com) Received: from mail.otherwhen.com (mail.2.229.205.in-addr.arpa [205.229.2.19] (may be forged)) by hostigos.otherwhen.com (8.8.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01553 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 08:44:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from PORKY/SpoolDir by mail.otherwhen.com (Mercury 1.45); 25 Jun 99 08:39:55 -0600 Received: from SpoolDir by PORKY (Mercury 1.45); 25 Jun 99 08:39:32 -0600 Received: from francis.otherwhen.com (12.73.250.121) by mail.otherwhen.com (Mercury 1.45) with ESMTP; 25 Jun 99 08:39:26 -0600 From: "Mike Avery (on the road)" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 08:39:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? In-reply-to: <19990625085803.A14126@intrepid.net> References: <19990624195332.F1893@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai on Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 07:53:32PM +0200 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12) Message-ID: <27FC8C472BE@mail.otherwhen.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 25 Jun 99, at 8:58, Mark Conway Wirt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 07:53:32PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > * Leif Neland (leifn@neland.dk) [990624 19:17]: > > > > > > Why not use uucp? Is it just considered old-fashioned, nobody understands > > > how to set it up, or are there heavy reasons not to use uucp? > > > > It seems nowadays nobody knows how to set it up anymore. > > > I Think it's more appropriate to say that "nowadays no MTA seem to > understand it" ;-) I hate issuing static IP's to dialup accounts -- even > business class, but with both MS Exchange and Lotus's products, you have > no choice. They're a bit brain dead.... If someone is running Exchange, Lotus Notes, Groupwise, Sendmail, or even Mercury, they are trying to run their own email services. And it would seem to be easiest if they have a fixed IP address. Even if you can remap the IP address for mail.mycustomer.com in DNS on the fly, the changes will take a while to propogate.... it seems better to give these people a static IP, even if it is a pain. Or - do you have a better solution? Mike ====================================================================== Mike Avery MAvery@mail.otherwhen.com (409)-842-2942 (work) ICQ: 16241692 * Spam is for lusers who can't get business any other way * A Randomly Selected Thought For The Day: Cereal port not responding - BREAKFAST halted. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message