From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jan 2 13:34:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC37E37B419; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:34:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g02LY4E88163; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:34:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: Stephen McKay Cc: Murray Stokely , John Baldwin , Alfred Perlstein , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? In-Reply-To: Message from Stephen McKay of "Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:25:46 +1000." <200201021425.g02EPks11288@dungeon.home> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 13:34:04 -0800 Message-ID: <88159.1010007244@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Various things have to be coordinated in parallel for this to work seamlessly. How ready is the ports/package team ready to do a complete cut-over for the affected branch? - Jordan > On Tuesday, 1st January 2002, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > >It wouldn't be that hard in sysinstall either, depending on how > >the X bits are packaged. FWIW, I also think that XFree86 4.x's time > >has come. > > None of my current video cards work properly with 3.3.6, so I'm all for > adding 4.1.0 immediately, rather than post release. Any chance? > > Stephen. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message