From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 10 12:14:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 391D014A08; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 12:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA201CD593; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 12:14:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 12:14:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Daniel O'Connor , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current In-Reply-To: <19990910122431.B99718@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils. I tend to agree. If we bring in all of this stuff (even though I appreciate it's very useful) we should also bring in samba into the base tree by symmetry. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message