From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 13 17:37:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932C0106566C; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.ipv6.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:6:c:20d:56ff:fe6f:f935]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229AE8FC08; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 009C71CC2F; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:37:40 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Li-Wen Hsu Message-ID: <20090713173739.GJ83265@droso.net> References: <200907091332.n69DWgXF055913@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <1e39c0a90907091948i5b11a4fdrb0d75cd08f245eac@mail.gmail.com> <20090710145547.GE86673@droso.net> <1e39c0a90907120222m4d0d7736ga6a7221e514b836b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1e39c0a90907120222m4d0d7736ga6a7221e514b836b@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:37:42 -0000 --wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > >> > >> I think these two are not an issue. =A0Default Python version is switc= hed to 2.6. > >> > >> But how this report generated? =A0Switching happened before > >> databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied. > >> > > The script is in Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. =A0Could this be caus= ed > > by the installed python version on the system it runs on? >=20 > Sounds possible, and that's what bsd.python.mk does. > databases/py25-bsddb is a slave port of databases/py-bsddb, > which generates python 2.5 package for some ports depend on > specified python version. When a system with python 2.5 > as the default setting, databases/py-bsddb and databases/py25-bsddb > should generate same package. So now the problem is, is it OK for them > have same LATEST_LINK? Or we can just ignore this problem, since this > should not effect official package build, and the latest links on the ftp. >=20 As you probably saw on the ports list, this also broke INDEX (not noticed before because the INDEX script has wedged it zfs mount). It looks like overriding LOCALBASE to /nonexistent does fix both issue as the script will no longer see the locally installed python version. This solves this issue. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.org \\\_\ /_/// The rest is silence <____) (____> erwin@lansing.dk --wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKW3Djqy9aWxUlaZARApJ7AJ9ARP18DAHaEiBqoZiCxV004t+22wCfX163 ySjmsKoCWNG+glcdAbhDZMw= =3qf5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG--