From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Wed Nov 8 16:30:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBABE578D2 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAD280B48; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 16:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vA8GUqLM055317 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:30:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vA8GUqag055316; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:30:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:30:52 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: Dima Pasechnik , Eitan Adler , "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cpow and clog Message-ID: <20171108163052.GA55224@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird> <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:30:55 -0000 On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:58:10PM +0000, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On 2017年11月8日 週三 at 23:03 Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely rots very quickly, > > > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree it > > > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision > > > control system. > > > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either. > > > > The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted. > > The patch was created under the officical revision control > > system used by FreeBSD. > > > We also have an official patch review system: https://reviews.freebsd.org , > which is not perfect, but still useable. This might help Dima's concern. > Looks like it requires "yet another account". -- Steve