From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 10 11:35:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B5AB35D0E for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B421733 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 620DCB35D0B; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A93B35D0A for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B47C1732 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 11:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id a17so22272127wme.0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 04:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h/FJq5QdcBt56w+xuY1rKOYPtxhXJsMPbrS+z4B/XHQ=; b=kIh2old9L73dmyWMEDxI7dWV/8Yq9HS8wTbA7XmcQzdxzRnicL80ItzbOXFYQGL/Gj tK33JTPB3LoAc9JgIUxddTj5SlCR/+iO1L7tdu4YZUvo90fl88T/PfYeEPdcU6WikOsn /XoCwbEdPJXklfzcOlHCVm5sPfcrpvZy+IPZ4Iet4BSL8DK8VJumCdg4kPUb2iVWhf1Y xJmnNwrrhr412CI3Re8Wu3vlMoc/YBbUrtssC4p9yTaPqyGGLtmekvoEJ+bPVVhWsak3 gUz0lPzcVJqHWobTImRWshnMrKj5CuekkhDaK/BquMBJnx/2ubS4i6zjZQL4MBaOAYXs 2miA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h/FJq5QdcBt56w+xuY1rKOYPtxhXJsMPbrS+z4B/XHQ=; b=hELyjQOQPeDVkhQdCvjiajfOtSf5GUWcZQUzBmAXlse6Zt+reH6y6aXSYbRgu+9BoW 06Ibc1vkBbVvahhk25DwRUkVbAwebWCKnH1xK1Yc4yMKF+IdjnjzoRxF+g8QGQGDMOaV 4FtPTN+RmJ0uQwozxFd053bYd3dy9DrlU9/qP/ZdGYwb/82fDMZgtjC1n9RL8ENIgXOq G34Nr2JURAPl7nilgjea61wQNGVakQHdwml7lHK4IYckJoS5BSaybN/WkmV9G+EeEKYb 5xCansCEMHIw3hQ+Qkld1/3+0UaT33Nr/kmr9AR9ELz3lA7SQOo88pD+U6wYdbaJUeqR 21IA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXRWv/nQ5MqA/Y+gI3CVS78T6HfhjBr5WK8eQkwmPkVxGtbA7bRQrO9DUnb/wTG9Q== X-Received: by 10.194.158.69 with SMTP id ws5mr38487942wjb.17.1462880119564; Tue, 10 May 2016 04:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([2.124.245.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w77sm29546310wmw.10.2016.05.10.04.35.18 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2016 04:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:35:17 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poudriere question Message-ID: <20160510123517.2107653b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <3557cbcd-3992-5db5-c5dc-7912508e1956@madpilot.net> References: <3557cbcd-3992-5db5-c5dc-7912508e1956@madpilot.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:35:21 -0000 On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:15:12 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently > > for different jails but using the same ports collection? > > =20 >=20 > Yes it is, or at least should be. >=20 > The ports trees are mounted read only in the jails, the wrkdir is > defined at a different path. What about the distfiles directory?=20 Having two "make checksums" running on the same file used to work fairly well, but not any more because the target now deletes an incomplete file rather than trying to resume it. This wont damage packages, but it can cause two "make checksums" to get locked in a cycle of deleting each other's files and end with one getting a failed checksum.=20