Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:35:17 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poudriere question Message-ID: <20160510123517.2107653b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <3557cbcd-3992-5db5-c5dc-7912508e1956@madpilot.net> References: <CAGwOe2Y7HjkK_QxocycmFcKzCUBAVU-87CWqOAzp6ZMUaJMbkA@mail.gmail.com> <3557cbcd-3992-5db5-c5dc-7912508e1956@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:15:12 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently > > for different jails but using the same ports collection? > > =20 >=20 > Yes it is, or at least should be. >=20 > The ports trees are mounted read only in the jails, the wrkdir is > defined at a different path. What about the distfiles directory?=20 Having two "make checksums" running on the same file used to work fairly well, but not any more because the target now deletes an incomplete file rather than trying to resume it. This wont damage packages, but it can cause two "make checksums" to get locked in a cycle of deleting each other's files and end with one getting a failed checksum.=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160510123517.2107653b>