Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 20:14:03 -0400 From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu> To: Peter.McGarvey@telinco.net Cc: FREEBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: BSD Theology: swap, /var, /tmp and /usr/tmp Message-ID: <390F6F4B.F0EF75C8@glue.umd.edu> References: <390F41FD.5880279E@telinco.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
There's been a lot of good info in this thread that I can't find in the Handbook. Seems to me that it needs to be included by those in the know. -Brandon Peter McGarvey wrote: > > Theological problem this. Facts and Opinions welcome... > > Okay, I /think/ I know what I'm doing when I slice-up a disk for a > FreeBSD system... > > / -> 64MB > swap -> 2 * memory (rounded-up to the nearest MB) > /usr -> the remaining disk > > Once setup I link /var and /tmp to /usr/var and /usr/temp > > This is the way I've always done it, I'm quite happy doing it this way, > it works for me and I've never had any problems. > > Fine, but now some upstart has asked me to set up a FreeBSD system with > the following.... > > / -> 5MB > swap 1 -> 512MB (equal to memory) > swap 2 -> 512MB > /var -> 2GB > /tmp -> 2GB > /usr -> remaining disk > > My first instinct is that the guy is barking mad (he is a Linux groupie > so... (and Linux does have a nasty habit of apropriating every entry in > the partition table)) > > However I've hit a snag - when it comes to FreeBSD partitions and slices > I know the HOW (and there is lot's of help on that), but I'm not too > sure of the WHY (and help here is lacking). > > 1. What I need is some rational reasoning why the way I do > things is right/wrong. > > 2. Why the way Linux man wants it is right/wrong. > > 3. Some info on the optimal size of swap > > 4. Where's the best place to put /var and /tmp > > Here is what I was told... > > On the issue of the 2 swap I was told two swap partitions were needed as > "we may need to turn one off as too much swap will slow the machine > down". > > Furthermore, I was told the 2*memory rule is no longer valid "once the > physical memory has exceeded 64MB" Can this true? Have I needlessly > been waisting mt HDD space by making swap too big? > > My thoughts were that swap was used as needed, when needed, and that > pages are not swapped to disk on a whim just because the swap space > existed (or perhaps this is how linux works so he's assuming FreeBSD > does it this way too). > > As for /var and /tmp why not link them to /usr/var and /usr/tmp. I can > understand putting them on physically seperate devices. But is it > strictly necissary to put them in their own slice? Is there a > performance benefit? or a is there some extra resiliency? > > Whilst I'm at it what is the difference between /tmp and /usr/tmp. I've > always treated them a seperate entities - assuming linking /tmp to > /usr/tmp was a bad thing. Linux man maligned FreeBSD big time when he > found there were two temporary directories. I couldn't respond as I > didn't know - and I refused to descent to his level by insulting his > prefered OS. > > Like I said this is mainly a theological problem. so all Facts and > Opinions welcome... > > -- > TTFN, FNORD > > Peter McGarvey, Unix Administrator > Network Operations Center, Telinco Limited > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?390F6F4B.F0EF75C8>