From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 23 10:08:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE9616A4CE for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:08:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoda.anything-inc.com (adsl-068-153-193-052.sip.bct.bellsouth.net [68.153.193.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F6743F85 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:08:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@anything-inc.com) X-AuthUser: freebsd@anything-inc.com Received: from neo.anything-inc.com (68.153.193.50:3258)Server] ; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:17:49 -0500 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20031123130031.00a9a020@anything-inc.com> X-Sender: freebsd@anything-inc.com@anything-inc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:03:47 -0500 To: FreeBSD From: Bob Collins In-Reply-To: <20031122003015.GO32267@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20031121092248.00ae5f60@anything-inc.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20031119090506.00a9c6a8@anything-inc.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20031114105727.00a9d6d8@anything-inc.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20031114105727.00a9d6d8@anything-inc.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20031119090506.00a9c6a8@anything-inc.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20031121092248.00ae5f60@anything-inc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=3.5 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Subject: Re: Disklabel problem IBM SCSI3 disks, vinum too X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 18:08:27 -0000 At 07:30 PM 11/21/2003, you wrote: >[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > >Quotation broken. > >On Friday, 21 November 2003 at 9:25:58 -0500, Bob Collins wrote: >> At 08:41 PM 11/19/2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] >>> >>> Quotation broken. >>> >>> On Wednesday, 19 November 2003 at 9:13:43 -0500, Bob Collins wrote: >>>> At 10:46 PM 11/17/2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Do you have device nodes for da4? Has it been labelled at all? >>>> >>>> I did not have `all' the nodes for da4 in /dev. So, I ran #sh MAKEDEV da4 >>>> in the /dev directory. After that, there were what appeared to be all the >>>> device nodes for da4. >>>> >>>> I was able to label the drive and use it with vinum under >>>> 5.0-RELEASE FWIW. Under 4.9-RELEASE (which is what I now run) it >>>> will not label through /stand/sysinstall. >>>> >>>> I can now newfs the drive and mount it and copy files to and fro, >>>> however I cannot use it with vinum. I did umount the drive and >>>> then disklabel -e da4 and changed the e: to h: and the filesystem >>>> type to vinum. It was da4s1e. >>>> >>>> When I create the vinum configuration, I either get that drive d >>>> (da4s1h) is referenced and in the down state while the other three >>>> drives are up, or the other three drives a b c are referenced and >>>> in the down state while drive d is up. >>> >>> I need the information I ask for in >>> http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html. >> >> FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE >> >> No changes to sources >> >> vinum -> list >> 4 drives: >> D d State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8747 MB (0%) >> D c State: up Device /dev/da2s1h Avail: 0/8747 MB (0%) >> D b State: up Device /dev/da3s1h Avail: 0/8747 MB (0%) >> D a State: up Device /dev/da4s1h Avail: 0/8747 MB (0%) >> >> 1 volumes: >> V raid State: down Plexes: 1 Size: 25 GB >> >> 1 plexes: >> P raid.p0 R5 State: init Subdisks: 4 Size: 25 GB >> >> 4 subdisks: >> S raid.p0.s0 State: empty PO: 0 B Size: 8747 MB >> S raid.p0.s1 State: empty PO: 512 kB Size: 8747 MB >> S raid.p0.s2 State: empty PO: 1024 kB Size: 8747 MB >> S raid.p0.s3 State: empty PO: 1536 kB Size: 8747 MB > >This doesn't agree with what you say above. It also looks fine to >me. > >Greg >-- My apologies, Greg. Quite right. I was messing with the system right before the response about sa4 device nodes in /dev. Once I made the da4 devices, then the disklabel worked. My mistake jumping the gun. One follow-up question if I may. I assume that the init process for a RAID5 takes quite some time, no? This has been in the init stage for 3 days. The vinum daemon is running as I can see it listed in ps -ax. Thank you Bob