Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 04:23:31 +0400 (MSD) From: "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" <babolo@links.ru> To: knu@idaemons.org (Akinori -Aki- MUSHA) Cc: babolo@links.ru, sada@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, tom@eborcom.com, girgen@partitur.se, cjh@kr.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Introducing a netscape wrapper Message-ID: <200005060023.EAA10809@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <86k8ha19em.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> from "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" at "May 5, 0 03:02:09 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA writes: > At Thu, 4 May 2000 20:27:29 +0400 (MSD), > Aleksandr A.Babaylov <babolo@links.ru> wrote: > > 3 is the Bad Thing IMHO > > look at ports/www/netscape-remote > > Why does it matter? Each netscape port already has a wrapper and the > new one just takes its place as a meta-wrapper. All given command > line options will be passed through to the netscape binary. > > Besides, I'd note that the netscape-remote is obsolete because > netscape 4.x itself has the `-remote' option, which the new wrapper > uses. And 2.X and 3.X too. netscape-remote is less so executes MUCH faster. -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005060023.EAA10809>