Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:28:39 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 metadata checksums Message-ID: <9bbcef730904231528v6badb9d1u27d89fb0e1cb1cb9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904231715220.98970@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet> References: <49F048FB.6000401@bqinternet.com> <gspmcv$92n$2@ger.gmane.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904231715220.98970@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/4/24 Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Scott Burns wrote: >> >>> 2) Is there a demand for this in FreeBSD? >> >> Speaking for myself, I'd like it on the systems I maintain. (I'd also >> like a sysctl to ignore the errors, just in case :) ). > > That's actually something ZFS could use if you ask me. In one instance I had > some bad ram that was causing checksum errors (zfs is better than memtest > for finding bad ram!), and I had to comment out the ECHKSUM error from the > kernel to recover the pieces of the file that were reported corrupt. Yes, this is my inspiration :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730904231528v6badb9d1u27d89fb0e1cb1cb9>