From owner-svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Fri Mar 31 13:10:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable-11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A08D27473 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from dec.sakura.ne.jp (dec.sakura.ne.jp [210.188.226.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9098BFC for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from fortune.joker.local (123-48-19-110.dz.commufa.jp [123.48.19.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by dec.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/[SAKURA-WEB]/20080708) with ESMTPA id v2VCXGpX012951 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:33:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:33:16 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316282 - stable/11/sys/boot/efi/boot1 Message-Id: <20170331213316.310f9a02459bfde462d2d252@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for only the 11-stable src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:10:29 -0000 > On 30 March 2017 at 13:23, Toomas Soome wrote: >> Author: tsoome >> Date: Thu Mar 30 17:23:40 2017 >> New Revision: 316282 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316282 >> ... >> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9870 > > In general I think "Differential Revision" should be left off MFCs. An > exception of course if it's a review specifically for the MFC, for > example where the change needs significant rework to apply to an older > branch. MFC r315326: This shouldn't be missed. -- Tomoaki AOKI