From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 4 16:18:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA15872 for current-outgoing; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA15864 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (richardc@localhost) by soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA03812; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:18:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:18:37 -0800 (PST) From: Veggy Vinny To: Stefan Esser cc: Joerg Wunsch , FreeBSD-current users Subject: Re: ncrcontrol in -current In-Reply-To: <199611042036.VAA02139@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Stefan Esser wrote: > The reason for a mismatch (if both ncrcontrol and the kernel > were in fact built from corresponding sources) is that you > specified some kernel config option (i.e. the maximum number > of LUNs or TAGs) that have not become visible to the build > process for ncrcontrol. Hmmm, okay... > So, please add those kernel options to the ncrcontrol Makefile > and rebuilt ncrcontrol, if that might be the cause of your > problem. Oh okay but I know I don't have any kernel options relating to the ncr since the other machines use Adaptec 2940W controllers and not the NCR-810. > I'm going to make ncrcontrol find all the parameters by some > other means (not from compile time options, that is :), but > this is not on top of my ToDo list ... Hmmm, that would be a good idea :) Vince GaiaNet Corporation - Unix Networking Operations - GUS Mailing Lists Admin