Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:48:52 +0000
From:      Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The path is now set for "busybox", FreeBSD style
Message-ID:  <C84592CD-D9F9-4340-A0D0-ADD31D38E0DA@webweaving.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinUjWqiMUmN0=fYTP8rjCzoHh=D%2B7XL=ROqWobM@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinUjWqiMUmN0=fYTP8rjCzoHh=D%2B7XL=ROqWobM@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 14 Nov 2010, at 03:40, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> I've committed the below changes to -HEAD. You can now create and =
build your
> own busybox style binary system, completely cross-compiled within the
> existing Make framework. It isn't as impressive as it sounds though - =
a lot
> of the framework is already there from just building crunchgen'ed
> rescue/sysinstall binaries.

Wonderful !

> Let me know if you'd like to give it a shot and I'll put my "bsdbox"
> Makefile scripts online to try.

Yes please,

Dw.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C84592CD-D9F9-4340-A0D0-ADD31D38E0DA>