Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:04:41 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken portstree? Message-ID: <3F995BA9.2000003@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <200310241752.56331.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> References: <200310241720.40898.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> <3F99438A.4090902@fillmore-labs.com> <200310241752.56331.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote: > On Friday 24 October 2003 17:21, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>USE_GNOME= NO >>in /etc/make.conf. > > Should I comment it out/remove it? [...] > > And on a sidenote... why does this happen (eg... mod_php4 hasn't anything to > do with gnome?). Newer *ever* set USE_* in /etc/make.conf or elsewhere. User settable options are WITH_* and WITHOUT_* User => Port: WITH_*, WITHOUT_* Port => bsd.port.mk USE_*, WANT_* In bsd.gnome.mk, we have: User => Port: WITH_*, WITHOUT_* Port => bsd.port.mk WANT_* bsd.port.mk => Port HAVE_* Port => bsd.port.mk USE_* It is really a little bit more complicated than that, especially PORTSDIR, WRKDIRPREFIX, PREFIX etc are user-settable, but it is supposed to work that way, and every port that has USE_* as an user-settable option should be filed a bug report. I'm not exactly sure if it is ok to communicate User => bsd.port.mk via WITH_*, though. It should be converted to WANT_*.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F995BA9.2000003>