From owner-freebsd-isp  Tue Aug  1 22:11:25 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from atlas.usls.edu (atlas.usls.edu [202.47.133.46])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C717237BF51
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Aug 2000 22:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from francis@usls.edu)
Received: by atlas.usls.edu (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 030449B34; Wed,  2 Aug 2000 13:11:12 +0800 (PHT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by atlas.usls.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E774B5D07
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Aug 2000 13:11:12 +0800 (PHT)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:11:12 +0800 (PHT)
From: "Francis A. Vidal" <francis@usls.edu>
To: FreeBSD ISP <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
Subject: Cyclades Z series vs. Cisco 2600
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008021307370.12776-100000@atlas.usls.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi all,

How does the Cyclades Z series system on a FreeBSD machine compare to
a Cisco 2600 router in terms of async/dialup performance? I'm also
interested to know why you chose Cyclades over Cisco and vice versa.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message