From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 16:26:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0D8CBD for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 16:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588FC638 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 16:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1WhiCP-000xJZ-Ul>; Tue, 06 May 2014 18:26:33 +0200 Received: from g226062030.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.226.62.30] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1WhiCP-000uEr-Ss>; Tue, 06 May 2014 18:26:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 18:26:28 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: performance of ipfw and pf in CURRENT? Message-ID: <20140506182628.36c98065.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.226.62.30 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 16:26:36 -0000 --Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A while ago some performance graphs were floating around here showing the n= et performance of ipfw and pf. pf was, as far as I can remember, the single th= readed version. Are there more recent performance benchmarks available? Even if pf= in FreeBSD is still behind pf in recent OpenBSD, FreeBSD has now an threaded adaption and= it would be nice to see the overall performance for both. Thanks, oh --Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTaQ05AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8cH0H/iUIzYK/XUrf0HzyAfcPew/L LMXU6qsnMq+WnPxLN2vCCiJGpCJeGe/YZYLGD6YVm+pAynYvthA4mvFNXqWxghik ZPivCg+lZOnC/TIXoKFjdv0G/rQxr1ZBLW9ax4dLmi0kZ5UQGHOsiYheVSs2Bvhy xQytWIU5syl75ptKld7TTysl99xucJGRnhZ2M6XtogGyD7ARCJN45HrLER0C+8JM KwTWc8Re0dp3qhFd4RfUJmE+TARuBlWBHu44fdZvM7y8iTdfqx5w+yM62Kh3ViLh spSNSK5RWqodduOU+lQh2Zj+wFdMuRA9a9L1hNq4L0+EAxOZWR0iusEP61lbdw8= =G4wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4--