From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 21:55:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D17C106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C66C8FC16; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2SLtn78042168; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:55:49 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:55:49 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kirk McKusick In-Reply-To: <201203282121.q2SLLJIu054695@svn.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201203282121.q2SLLJIu054695@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:55:49 +0400 (MSK) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r233629 - head/sys/ufs/ffs X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:55:57 -0000 Dear Kirk, On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Kirk McKusick wrote: > Author: mckusick > Date: Wed Mar 28 21:21:19 2012 > New Revision: 233629 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233629 > > Log: > A refinement of change 232351 to avoid a race with a forcible unmount. > While we have a snapshot vnode unlocked to avoid a deadlock with another > inode in the same inode block being updated, the filesystem containing > it may be forcibly unmounted. When that happens the snapshot vnode is > revoked. We need to check for that condition and fail appropriately. Thank you and Kostik very much! How far we are from enabling snapshot of SU+J UFS back? [snip] -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------