From owner-freebsd-audit Sat Mar 16 2: 2:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE137B400; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 6CD845347; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:02:40 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "J. Mallett" Cc: "Tim J. Robbins" , freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patch for review: xargs standards compliance References: <20020315231100.A20942@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020316192629.A5254@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020316090004.A26394@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020316093507.B26394@FreeBSD.ORG> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 16 Mar 2002 11:02:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020316093507.B26394@FreeBSD.ORG> Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "J. Mallett" writes: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:40:26AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > No, Solaris' xargs specifically checks that the argument to -E and -I > > is not empty. I have the source in front of me. > Should we do this then? Why not? An empty string doesn't make sense for either of them. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message