From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 14:30:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1956B16A405 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 14:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FC413C44C for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 14:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l49EU6nE031822 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 14:30:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l49EU69v031821; Wed, 9 May 2007 14:30:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:30:06 GMT Message-Id: <200705091430.l49EU69v031821@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Gavin Atkinson Cc: Subject: Re: kern/98015: [bfe] [patch] bfe(4): double free in error handling path. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gavin Atkinson List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:30:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/98015; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gavin Atkinson To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, uspoerlein@gmail.com Cc: pjd@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/98015: [bfe] [patch] bfe(4): double free in error handling path. Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 15:22:02 +0100 Hi, A patch was committed to -HEAD by pjd (if_bfe.c 1.32) with a simpler patch (as it doesn't attempt to use the bfe_detach routine) and had the following log message: Don't call bfe_release_resources() twice. Found by: Coverity Prevent analysis tool CID: 600 MFC after: 1 week This patch was never MFC'd, but looks to fix the issue reported. pjd, is there any reason this cannot be MFC'd? Gavin