From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Mar 30 14:05:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64BC5C7688 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@osfux.nl) Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (vm1982.osfux.nl [IPv6:2a03:5500:1724:55:79:99:187:212]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8rnx5F9vz4lJq for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@osfux.nl) Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC37821A for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:05:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none shortcircuit=no X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 Received: from [192.168.9.195] (unknown [185.59.222.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:05:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: From: Ruben Message-ID: <6c3da6ff-d102-b2d9-5433-4dac4116d27f@osfux.nl> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:05:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F8rnx5F9vz4lJq X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[osfux.nl:s=default]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a03:5500:1724:55:79:99:187:212:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a03:5500:1724:55:79:99:187:212:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[osfux.nl:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[osfux.nl,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8315, ipnet:2a03:5500::/31, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:05:58 -0000 Hi, Did you mean 12.1-p5 or 12.2-p5 ? I'm asking because you refer to both 12.1-p5 and 12.2-p5 (typo?). If you meant 12.2-p5: Perhaps the FreeBSD security team did not bump the version, but "only" backported the patches to version 1.1.1h ? Regards, Ruben On 3/30/21 3:35 PM, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > Recently there was > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. > > What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. > Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-freebsd  22 Sep 2020 > > Up-to-date stable/13-n245043-7590d7800c4 reports OpenSSL 1.1.1k-freebsd > 25 Mar 2021 > > shouldn't the 12.2-p5 be reporting openssl 1.1.1k-freebsd as well? > > thanks,