From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 19 18:40:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5A116A406 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2562243D62 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3JIeL35079885 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:40:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3JIeKcK079884; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:40:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:40:20 GMT Message-Id: <200604191840.k3JIeKcK079884@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jung-uk Kim Cc: Subject: Re: kern/95661: [pci] [patch] pci_pci still not correct for initializing cardbus on HP AMD laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jung-uk Kim List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:40:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/95661; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jung-uk Kim To: "Brian J. McGovern" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, mcgovern@spoon.beta.com, John Baldwin , imp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/95661: [pci] [patch] pci_pci still not correct for initializing cardbus on HP AMD laptop Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:35:25 -0400 On Wednesday 19 April 2006 02:26 pm, Brian J. McGovern wrote: > Agreed, but it works in 6.0 and 6.1. My opinion is that this is a > reasonable work around for the 6.x lifecycle until the "stable" > tree moves to 7.x, and we get SMBIOS support. In fact, the attached patch is incorrect because it does not care whether the BIOS is broken or not. That's why we have different version in -CURRENT. A 'real' fix is to re-do subordinate bus numbers when we initialize PCI bridges - search for XXX comments in the same function. I believe jhb or imp was interested in fixing these at some point but I don't remember who it was; spamming both. ;-) > I could beg for MFC'ing SMBIOS support, but I think it'd be a much > tougher sell, and I doubt I can talk anyone in to it for 6.1. :) I believe you are right about that. :-( Jung-uk Kim