From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 03:45:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D506716A42A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:45:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A154B4435A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 03:15:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192E20067E; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 20:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j773FRZQ058997; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 20:15:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Message-ID: <42F57CCE.2060804@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:15:26 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050424 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Mikkelsen References: <002c01c59ae9$6f3c7de0$0204a8c0@transactionware.com> In-Reply-To: <002c01c59ae9$6f3c7de0$0204a8c0@transactionware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WAN cards: Sangoma vs. Tahoe group X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:45:24 -0000 Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking using either Sangoma cards or the Tahoe Group cards for > connections to a frame relay network (Telstra in Australia, for what it's > worth). > > I'm comparing the Sangoma A101-U to the Tahoe 971 and the Sangoma S5141 to > the Tahoe 931. > >>From looking at the archives, people seem generally happy with Sangoma, but > I can't find much on the Tahoe cards and FreeBSD. The software for the > Tahoe cards is significantly simpler than the Sangoma Wanpipe stuff. > > What are the general experiences of these cards? Is anyone actually using > the Tahoe cards? If you can get a dumb sync card that runs with the sr or ar drivers then FreeBSD has built in frame relay code. > > Thanks, > > Jan Mikkelsen > janm@transactionware.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"