Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:13:08 +0100
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: libreoffice
Message-ID:  <51268DE4.90607@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1302212054050.33694@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1302181242290.68127@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <51264219.2020409@bsdforen.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1302212054050.33694@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21/02/2013 20:54, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
>> just the same time it made your system start take longer.
> 
> true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice the waiting time.

That's strange. As long as you've got enough RAM all the data should
remain cached. A successive start of libreoffice takes < 1s on my system.

Only the first start gives me a couple of seconds of hard disk activity.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51268DE4.90607>