From owner-cvs-all Sat Jul 10 8:29:49 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC1314C86; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 08:29:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA99982; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:29:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: janus.syracuse.net: green owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:29:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Bruce Evans Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa intr_machdep.c In-Reply-To: <199907101454.HAA27810@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, Bruce Evans wrote: > bde 1999/07/10 07:54:20 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/i386/isa intr_machdep.c > Log: > Fixed a longstanding scheduling bug. ASTs and softclock interrupts were > not masked during handling of shared PCI interrupts. This resulted in > ASTs sometimes being discarded and softclock interrupts sometimes being > handled prematurely (sometimes = quite often on systems with shared PCI > interrupts, never on other systems). > > Debugged by: gibbs and other people at plutotech.com > PR: 6944, maybe 12381 > > Revision Changes Path > 1.23 +13 -12 src/sys/i386/isa/intr_machdep.c > The only functional change is oldspl being intrmask_t instead of int. Is that what fixes it? If so, when should we using intrmask_t instead of int? Just curious :) Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message