Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:47:57 +0200 From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS problem: file doesn't appear in file listing, but can be accessed directly Message-ID: <4C614A7D.8030509@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <163511110.410136.1281226007565.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <163511110.410136.1281226007565.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/08/2010 02:06 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: >> On 07.08.2010, at 02:35, Rick Macklem wrote: >> >> I agree, this must be some kind of server issue then. Still, I wonder >> why the solaris client didn't show the problem... >> >> > 2 things: > 1 - the solaris client uses ReaddirPlus and not Readdir RPCs by > default (I can't remember if that default can be overridden?). I don't know whether this counts or not, but I've tried with an old Solaris (x86) 8 (uname says it's Generic_108529-06). > ps: I don't recall the previous emails mentioning that the "ls" > was ok for a solaris client. > It was in 4C582968.9000303@fsn.hu: "I've mounted the share from an old Solaris box, which sees the file." This means, when I issue an ls | grep problematic_fname, I can see the filename. BTW, this turned out to be incorrect, because I've tested with the same (one of the missing) filename. Doing a find . in the directory on both FreeBSD and Solaris client shows some differences. So what I have now is: both the normal and the experimental NFSD show the problem on both FreeBSD and Solaris clients (only the missing file names are different). On Solaris there are 78 files missing, on FreeBSD there are 193, I haven't checked that they are persistent across reboots or not.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C614A7D.8030509>