Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:08:55 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: differences in supported filesystems between FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <430344F7.6060105@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <20050816141236.GA26422@dan.emsphone.com> References: <b7052e1e05081122446572c8b0@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050811225358.04fdf160@cobalt.antimatter.net> <4301E817.9030000@dial.pipex.com> <20050816141236.GA26422@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (Aug 16), Alex Zbyslaw said: > > >>>UFS2 expanded some fields from 32 bits to 64, and added or changed a >>>few features, but the two are still very similar. >>> >>> >>UFS2 also added snapshots which make live dumps safer, among other >>things. >> >> > >Snapshots work just fine with UFS1. > > > Apologies for spreading misinformation. Snapshots were one of the things I was looking forward to after upgrading to 5.X, and since UFS2 also came with 5.X I guess I assumed the two were related. --Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?430344F7.6060105>