Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:08:55 +0100
From:      Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: differences in supported filesystems between FreeBSD versions
Message-ID:  <430344F7.6060105@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050816141236.GA26422@dan.emsphone.com>
References:  <b7052e1e05081122446572c8b0@mail.gmail.com>	<6.1.0.6.2.20050811225358.04fdf160@cobalt.antimatter.net>	<4301E817.9030000@dial.pipex.com> <20050816141236.GA26422@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote:

>In the last episode (Aug 16), Alex Zbyslaw said:
>  
>
>>>UFS2 expanded some fields from 32 bits to 64, and added or changed a
>>>few features, but the two are still very similar.
>>>      
>>>
>>UFS2 also added snapshots which make live dumps safer, among other
>>things.
>>    
>>
>
>Snapshots work just fine with UFS1.
>
>  
>
Apologies for spreading misinformation.  Snapshots were one of the 
things I was looking forward to after upgrading to 5.X, and since UFS2 
also came with 5.X I guess I assumed the two were related.

--Alex




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?430344F7.6060105>