From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 11:35:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6115616A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:35:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.latnet.lv (trollis.latnet.lv [159.148.19.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0BF243D46 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaspars@os.lv) Received: (qmail 22782 invoked by uid 102); 4 Mar 2005 11:34:59 -0000 Received: from 159.148.155.3 by trollis (envelope-from , uid 64011) with qmail-scanner-1.23st (spamassassin: 2.64. perlscan: 1.23st. Clear:RC:1(159.148.155.3):. Processed in 0.026606 secs); 04 Mar 2005 11:34:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO os.lv) (159.148.155.3) by trollis.latnet.lv with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 11:34:58 -0000 Received: from 213.182.201.44 ([213.182.201.44]) by os.lv (WinRoute Pro 4.1) with SMTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4228481D.9080708@os.lv> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:35:57 +0200 From: Kaspars User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: full of process X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:35:04 -0000 Hi, Sorry maybe for stupid q. I just some year of little exerpience with 4.x & 5.x FreeBSD and don`t know even how to ask it to google... :) I have current 5.3 FreeBSD updated etc. Boot and have full in ps aux: root 7 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? SL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [acpi_task0] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? SL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [acpi_task1] root 9 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? SL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [acpi_task2] root 10 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? DL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [ktrace] root 15 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq1: atkbd0] root 16 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq3: sio1] root 17 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq4: sio0] root 18 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq5:] root 19 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq6:] root 20 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq7: ppc0] root 21 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq8: rtc] root 22 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq9: acpi0] root 23 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq10:] root 24 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq11:] root 25 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq12:] root 26 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq13:] root 27 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq14: ata0] root 28 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq15: ata1] root 29 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq16:] root 30 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq17:] root 31 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? WL 1:30PM 0:00.00 [irq18:] .... I never see it before so I concern why so many irq something in process up... PC is: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu Feb 17 20:38:18 EET 2005 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.04-MHz 686-class CPU) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 Any point for understanding is it ok? :) thanks to all, Casper