Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom <freebsd@philip.pjkh.com> To: Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michael Grant <mgrant@grant.org> Subject: Re: jails or chroot? Message-ID: <20060509105029.M26753@bravo.pjkh.com> In-Reply-To: <200605091136.52611.mistry.7@osu.edu> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <b2807d040605090458o6c53d829ic066c1c78f320356@mail.gmail.com> <62b856460605090524m11ed2afxda3ee0841f7db62f@mail.gmail.com> <200605091136.52611.mistry.7@osu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> With the inclusion of mergemaster -u subsequent base system upgrades > are much less painful. Using null mounts for the common areas should > lessen the version sync issues. Once unionfs is stable again, you > could just use one jail as a base image and allow the others to be > cloned off of that. ezjail might come in handy as well... http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060509105029.M26753>