From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep  6 12:55:08 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9538E97
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 12:55:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::3:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E14133C
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 12:55:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05B96003D5
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 14:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net
Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9OlHV3Zek5xe for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
 Sat,  6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net
 [IPv6:2001:470:7b43:1:6a05:caff:fe01:aae9])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK))
 by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 69C9E301E9; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200
From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Needs triage ..
Message-ID: <20140906125502.GA1892@elch.exwg.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20140906221516.Q58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140906221516.Q58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:55:08 -0000

## Ian Smith (smithi@nimnet.asn.au):

> Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@?  Can anyone play? :)

The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list.
But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which
happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling
of reports), this looks like bad hardware.
If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi?

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space