From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Aug  8 12:25:35 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B3F37B62A
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  8 Aug 2000 12:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e78JPLv14364;
	Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:25:20 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: named and named-xfer
Message-ID: <20000808122520.H4854@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008081455360.30826-100000@mercury.wlcg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008081455360.30826-100000@mercury.wlcg.com>; from rsimmons@wlcg.com on Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 02:57:08PM -0400
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com> [000808 12:04] wrote:
> Are the binaries of named and named-xfer that are distributed with
> 4.1-RELEASE statically linked?

no.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message